Video: The importance of publishing negative studies
(This is part 2 of a series of posts featuring speakers from “Challenging the Science Publishing Status Quo”, an evening of talks about peer review, data sharing, and open access. Previously: Lawrence...
View ArticleNo article fee for negative results until end of August
[NB: this campaign has been extended until the end of September. Read more.] Negative, and proud of it! It can be very difficult to get papers presenting negative or null results published. Many...
View ArticleMigratory birds and negative results
Last month we published an article by Mark Peterson of Indiana University, about the genetics of song birds. Mark’s work looked for sequence variants of two genes (known to affect migration) between...
View ArticleScientific quality in negative results – comments please
We at F1000Research have a strong belief in transparency: transparency in peer review; transparency in research that is published, through the release and publication of all the underlying data; and...
View ArticleNegative results fee waiver extended until end of September
A few months ago, we announced a grace period to submit your negative results papers for free until the end of August. The news spread far and wide, and we’ve had amazing feedback. Many of you were...
View Article
